10 ms·
I am curious about how this decision meshes with the concurrent announcement that the KDE/GNOME folks are looking at using Flathub as a Linux Store: https://ne
by voakbasda 4y ago
I am curious about how this decision meshes with the concurrent announcement that the KDE/GNOME folks are looking at using Flathub as a Linux Store:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34916644 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34916644
- wkat4242 4y agoYeah this article is very pro-snap and disregards the movement in favor of flatpak which has stepped up in kind.
- lproven 4y agoI wrote the article. I am not particularly pro-Snap. I am not particularly pro or anti anything in this space. I repeatedly said that Flatpak has strong popular support. It does. I see it often. What I tried to point out was the ways Canonical feels that Snap is superior to Flatpak. There is a lot of FUD in this debate. More than usual. Personally, once I discovered Martin Wimpress' `deb-get` tool, I removed both snap and flatpak from my own main Ubuntu boxes. But then I joined the freebie Ubuntu Pro deal and then snapd gets reinstalled, so it didn't seem worth fighting it. But Pro has nothing I personally need, so I may yet purge them both again. If nothing else, I enjoyed the faster startups, the cleaner `mount` output, and the simpler update routine.