3 ms·
Yes but invariably they were not rich. In fact too many died in poverty. The commercial, popular art era started when copies became available to the market, and
by zerostar07 15y ago
Yes but invariably they were not rich. In fact too many died in poverty. The commercial, popular art era started when copies became available to the market, and it ends when copies become zero cost.
Hollywood's obsession with mega-productions tends to be an attempt to force-feed mediocre movies rather than advancing the arts anymore
BTW, Coppola suggests 3 rules
1) Write and direct original screenplays,
2) Make them with the most modern technology available, and
3) Self-finance them
Technology has made it trivial for almost everyone to have (2) and (3). Now technology should create avenues for artists to receive a fair compensation for their work, but they should know that it will be nothing like the exorbitant commissions of the past.
- marquis 15y agoYes, I agree. I was just commenting on there being other ways for artists to make a living, much like Coppola does not rely on his film income.
- ijk 15y agoI'll note that recently Hollywood has largely abandoned the mid-range productions as being too risky for the potential payoff. It's all go big or go home for the studios.
- killerdark 15y agoThat's what Louis CK did with his web release right?