4 ms·

Okay don't do it. Instead you're just going to believe the guy who cited nothing? Live your life however you want I guess...

• anigbrowl 4y ago
  I'm not going to believe either of you. What you offered was not responsive to his claim because it didn't address risks to children, which are the topic.
  • gretch 4y ago
    You can’t not believe either of us. He said a thing and I said it’s false. If you don’t believe him then you agree with me. This btw is the correct course of logic since the burden of proof is on the asserter.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • notch898a 4y ago
      "False" is your assertion. You have the burden of proof in that claim. If you just wanted proof you should have asked for that rather than make a new, different assertion. The person you replied to took the 3rd option of the tri-state, which requires no burden, which is to merely remain skeptical.
    • Falkon1313 4y ago
      Well yes. So you asserted a thing and didn't prove it. Therefore the correct course of logic is to dismiss your assertion.
    • anigbrowl 4y ago
      I have yet to make up my mind - a possibility that seems not to have occurred to you.