3 ms·
Because traditional packages are running out of steam. IMO people want a stable (not changing) underlying OS with a dynamic set of frequently updating applicati
by eikenberry 4y ago
Because traditional packages are running out of steam. IMO people want a stable (not changing) underlying OS with a dynamic set of frequently updating applications on top. Arch nails the second part but completely fails on the first. Debian nails the first but fails on the second. Something new is needed.
- wkat4242 4y agoFreeBSD is actually excellent at this with a traditional package system. Stable OS but rolling packages. That's why I use it.