4 ms·
I feel this is an area where AI could be helpful in recognizing suspected fraudulent, or potentially just poorly studied research.
by pedalpete 4y ago
I feel this is an area where AI could be helpful in recognizing suspected fraudulent, or potentially just poorly studied research.
- eep_social 4y agoWhy do you say that?
- anitil 4y agoI used to follow a blog (possibly retraction watch? I can't remember now) where they would go through basic biology papers and find photoshopped/edited images and ask the author about them. Sometimes this would lead to retractions etc. They did mention other people had tried and failed to build tools for this, but the current state of the art was drinking-a-coffee-and-looking-at-it-real-hard. This was before the current explosion of AI, so maybe it's different now? Anyone else able to chime in? Edit: Found it! https://scienceintegritydigest.com https://scienceintegritydigest.com