3 ms·

And that's fine - I'm not affirming or denying that he's done anything meaningful. That's why I'm saying you should try to look at his statement by filtering ou

And that's fine - I'm not affirming or denying that he's done anything meaningful. That's why I'm saying you should try to look at his statement by filtering out who is saying it, what they've done, and what their ulterior motive might be. Does anyone disagree that there are bigger problems to be solved than are currently being tackled by many startups? Not that most startups can tackle the daunting task of solving some of these problems themselves (at least, not without some serious IP and capital), but it's useful for a bit of perspective. Are we really solving some fundamental problem in the world by perfecting daily deals? No - it's silly to argue otherwise.

badclient 15y ago
"Are we really solving some fundemental problem by letting college kids at elite universities poke each other?" --your line of argument applied to facebook in its early days
- Toddward 15y ago
  And? Do you see me touting Facebook as the company that will save the world?
  - badclient 15y ago
    You stated that you agreed with the message in the post, which included: But the 100th engineer at Facebook had a greater positive impact on the world
    - Toddward 15y ago
      Ok, allow me to clarify my position: I agree with notion that there are more important problems to work on than many we see startups pursuing. If you had to pick a primary point being conveyed by the column, would you pick A) there are many important problems that startups could be working on or B) the 100th Facebook engineer made a more meaningful impact on the world than some popular startup founders? I chose option A. Regardless, you seem content to argue with me because I choose to acknowledge his point. I don't care who he is, what he's worked on, or what other credentials he has - I agree with his core message, that we should choose to work on bigger ideas that change the world, not meaningless ones. As an aside, I do think it can be necessary to go with smaller ideas in order to cash out and pursue greater ones. Case in point: Elon Musk; while PayPal wasn't necessarily a small thing, it pales in comparison to his current endeavors, which I believe will have a long-lasting impact on the world.

badclient 15y ago

"Are we really solving some fundemental problem by letting college kids at elite universities poke each other?" --your line of argument applied to facebook in its early days

Toddward 15y ago
And? Do you see me touting Facebook as the company that will save the world?
- badclient 15y ago
  You stated that you agreed with the message in the post, which included: But the 100th engineer at Facebook had a greater positive impact on the world
  - Toddward 15y ago
    Ok, allow me to clarify my position: I agree with notion that there are more important problems to work on than many we see startups pursuing. If you had to pick a primary point being conveyed by the column, would you pick A) there are many important problems that startups could be working on or B) the 100th Facebook engineer made a more meaningful impact on the world than some popular startup founders? I chose option A. Regardless, you seem content to argue with me because I choose to acknowledge his point. I don't care who he is, what he's worked on, or what other credentials he has - I agree with his core message, that we should choose to work on bigger ideas that change the world, not meaningless ones. As an aside, I do think it can be necessary to go with smaller ideas in order to cash out and pursue greater ones. Case in point: Elon Musk; while PayPal wasn't necessarily a small thing, it pales in comparison to his current endeavors, which I believe will have a long-lasting impact on the world.