3 ms·
have you been able to contact OpenAI about this? It sounds like they're actively adding load to your CS ops with this
by fire 4y ago
have you been able to contact OpenAI about this? It sounds like they're actively adding load to your CS ops with this
- hackernewds 4y agowhat are they going to do? add custom logic? where does it stop? the malady is that LLMs cannot do operational adhoc changes such as these kinds of errors at scale
- mtmail 4y agoWell, we can argue such changes are necessary. Just like Google Search is required to remove/hide some search results (based on regional juristrictions). Is that similar to censorship, or copyright law, or spreading fake information? I do see the counter-argument, too, where AI tools should just be tools and users should learn how they work ("don't believe everything this tool outputs").
- dpkirchner 4y agoThey've already added custom logic to prevent their LLM from e.g. praising Nazis or whatever restrictions people are upset about -- seems it'd be easy to configure the software to exclude references to known unavailable services.
- nextaccountic 4y agoThey absolutely do add custom logic for a lot of stuff. This has the side effect of neutering the functionality in some areas just to chastise the user for any perceived improper use of services.
- SCLeo 4y agoI think the key thing is for the AI company to actually let the user know that this is a language model, and the information it spits out should not be trusted. Obviously, Microsoft is not going to do that as they are trying to market the new bing as a information search engine.
- squeaky-clean 4y agoOpenAI does its best to make it clear that it is just a language model, but what can you do with you have users that just instantly click "Agree, Agree, Next, Next, Agree"
- aPoCoMiLogin 4y agoclearly not best enough