3 ms·
Agreed but property tax should not be based on the current value of the home. Property prices are insane. It's both unfair that the guy in the expensive home
by theironhammer 4y ago
Agreed but property tax should not be based on the current value of the home.
Property prices are insane.
It's both unfair that the guy in the expensive home pays a huge amount in taxes as it is also unfair that the other guys property taxes are locked in to when property prices were less insane.
- bradgessler 4y agoIn theory, yes, but in practice what happens is those people get priced out of their homes anyway. If a retired person was living in the $1.8m home in my example above and was paying a low tax based on the 1970's of the house, they might not be able to afford moving to a more practical $900k one-bedroom apartment/condo because their tax rate would increase and they may not have the cashflow to pay for that bill (even considering the proceeds from the sale of the home). If you walk through SF, even really nice neighborhoods like St. Franciswood, you'll see large beautiful homes that are in severe states of disrepair because the owners don't have the cashflow to pay for the enormous costs of repairing their homes. They'd be better off moving to a smaller dwelling, but they won't because it could cost more and the incentives are more out of whack.
- dantheman 4y agoThe problem is that property is taxed as a percentage of it's value and as the value goes up the government just gets more money. Instead the government should set a goal of how much revenue it needs and as the property value goes up, the percentage rate drops.