3 ms·
>I'm not sure how you expect us to manually count 150 million ballots quicker without using any hackable electronics. The solution to vote counting scales righ
by ChickenNugger 4y ago
>I'm not sure how you expect us to manually count 150 million ballots quicker without using any hackable electronics.
The solution to vote counting scales right along side the problem. You use more human counters. If it takes 2% of the population to count votes, then you just...keep using the same percentage, just more people.
I reiterate: There is no good faith reason to use electronic voting machines. It injects an ability to scale up election fraud, and that is all it does.
- slg 4y ago>If it takes 2% of the population to count votes, then you just...keep using the same percentage, just more people. And if we build a team of 9 women, I bet they can produce a baby in a single month.
- ChickenNugger 4y agoFalse analogy. You can split stacks of ballots to be counted and hand them to different people. I don't know why you're arguing so hard in favor of electronic voting when it's good for no one but voting machine companies and election thieves.