That's a false dilemma. You can control both. You can take measures to reduce the probability of a nuclear accident, and the impact of a nuclear accident if it

That's a false dilemma. You can control both. You can take measures to reduce the probability of a nuclear accident, and the impact of a nuclear accident if it were to happen. You can also take measures to reduce the continuous pollution coming from fossil fuels. Depending on which measures you implement, how stringent they are, and how strictly they are enforced, either nuclear or fossil-based power plants may come ahead.