3 ms·
It's entirely common for luxury properties to be seen as investments. Having people actually live there would reduce their value as investments. See any of the
by kibwen 4y ago
It's entirely common for luxury properties to be seen as investments. Having people actually live there would reduce their value as investments. See any of the new luxury skyscrapers in Manhattan, whose units are mostly vacant despite being sold. More luxury housing doesn't solve a damn thing.
- km3r 4y agoSo add a vacancy tax (like SF and Oakland have). Even though our vacancy rate shows this is not a problem currently.