3 ms·
For some threat models, that would almost be a good thing because if Mulled is a CryptoAG-style front, they aren't going to blow there cover on something trivia
by morpheuskafka 4y ago
For some threat models, that would almost be a good thing because if Mulled is a CryptoAG-style front, they aren't going to blow there cover on something trivial like a copyright lawsuit.
- medstrom 4y agoAnd an intelligence agency is not as willing to share their data as an ISP would be, so you pretty much still win over the status quo. Indeed, several ISPs were found to be sharing with intelligence agencies anyway, so by putting your traffic directly through them, you at least remove the ISP from the picture and the 50 other companies they would've also shared with.
- hammock 4y ago>several ISPs were found to be sharing with intelligence agencies In the US, I would suspect all of them. They ply you with multimillion dollar contracts. If you try to resist, they weaponize whatever they can against you. Consider the case of Qwest. After the CEO refused to work with the NSA, he was brought in on unrelated criminal charges: https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/former-qwest-ceo-joe-nacchio-tells-story-of-fight-against-nsa-sec https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/former-qwest-ceo-joe-na...
- hulitu 4y agoYou will be surprised. They don't only share data. They also modify it.