3 ms·
> Probably yes -- but you would be deadly wrong. Sort of. Smoking was initially only modestly dangerous, but became vastly more dangerous over time. So the sit
by Alex3917 4y ago
> Probably yes -- but you would be deadly wrong.
Sort of. Smoking was initially only modestly dangerous, but became vastly more dangerous over time. So the situation isn't entirely analogous.
- arcticbull 4y agoNo? Putting tobacco smoke in your lungs was always dangerous, it didn’t suddenly become that way.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- raman325 4y agoI don't think this comment is in conflict with its parent. Danger isn't binary.
- majkinetor 4y agoBut suddently you started to inhale smoke of numerious other additivies they put into it in the meantime.