4 ms·
It's not a waste in all ways. A car gets you where you want at the time you want. Whereas a train gets you close to where you want to go at some time. So bet
by chrisandchris 4y ago
It's not a waste in all ways.
A car gets you where you want at the time you want. Whereas a train gets you close to where you want to go at some time.
So better depends on what's more important to you. If you take a look at ecology, sure, trains are far better than a 1 person in a car. If you look at flexibility, cars are far more better.
- timeon 4y ago> It's not a waste in all ways. I think you are talking about convenience while they were talking about ecology.
- billfruit 4y agoAlso safety could also be a factor. Car travel is more unsafe than trains.
- aziaziazi 4y agoYour oversimplified comparaison sounds good but is not true : trains spend (way) less fuel AND are more flexible: - you can pee anytime - you can choose different class without changing materials - you can book as much tickets for your whole family and kid's friends. Everybody will travel together, no separate cars, no additional drivers - and my favorite : you can enjoy your ride with meditation, work, movie... edit:formating
- b800h 4y agoYou used to be able to meet great people and have a good chat in the smoking carriage. Alas it is no more.
- Gud 4y agoYou can also rent a car at your destination, or take cab
- chrisandchris 4y agoI think that oversimplifies it a bit. I traveled to enough places in Europe where either there are no close renting stations or cabs are way to expensive. Think Switzerland.