4 ms·
You're right, they're not the same thing. I would imagine killing an infant yourself after it's born is a lot harder (and actually murder) than having a non-med
by yucky 4y ago
You're right, they're not the same thing. I would imagine killing an infant yourself after it's born is a lot harder (and actually murder) than having a non-medically necessary later term abortion. And yet hundreds of women do it every year. If you think "literally nobody" has a non-medically necessary late term abortion, then you need to provide some evidence to back up such an absurd statement. It's legal in all those states for a reason.
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoIf you say that it happens, you provide proof that it does: that's the way round that proof works. Do not shift the burden of proof. "prove the absence" is a well-known absurdity in general. Your imaginings about infanticide are uninteresting, and I think wrong, but it also seems that you would rather pick nits about this insane comparison, so no.
- yucky 4y ago> Your imaginings about infanticide are uninteresting https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2174580/ https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1578 https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.16... There is actually a metric shit ton of research on infanticide, I'm not sure what would lead you to pretend it's not real.
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoUninteresting distraction, since as pointed out above, it is unrelated to the topic at hand. > I'm not sure what would lead you to pretend it's not real Word games. Again: pointless distraction, dishonest, uninteresting. Burden of proof remains on you.