3 ms·
Yes, it is following the letter of the law, but the NetBSD people are also free to complain about it. OpenBSD does the same: they list a bunch of vendors at [1
by koenigdavidmj 15y ago
Yes, it is following the letter of the law, but the NetBSD people are also free to complain about it.
OpenBSD does the same: they list a bunch of vendors at [1] but they note on [2]:
> In the 10 years since the inception of the OpenSSH project, these companies have contributed not even a dime of thanks in support of the OpenSSH project (despite numerous requests).
1: http://www.openssh.com/users.html http://www.openssh.com/users.html
2: http://www.openssh.com/ http://www.openssh.com/
- there 15y agoand now pf, too. http://callfortesting.org/macpf/ http://callfortesting.org/macpf/
- cbo 15y agoSure, they can complain. But if they're going to, they should just impose more restrictions on using their code. Maybe even a copyleft license. If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.
- niklasl 15y agoThere is no complaining on this page though. He just seems excited that code from NetBSD has been that widely deployed,