5 ms·

Do Great Things

78 points by dabent 15y ago

Aloisius 15y ago
Oh for goodness sakes. I'm sick of this woe-is-me, I-wasn't-around-for-the-90s, entrepreneurship is killing Silicon Valley bs. It is hard for Facebook to get an engineer. It is hard for Google to get an engineer. It is not particularly hard for a reasonably funded startup to get an engineer. I have a startup in San Francisco. When I post job opening, I get 50+ applications. When I email my network, I pick up even more. Because I'm picky, it probably takes 100 resumés before I find someone I'm looking for. However, there are plenty of people out there that, with six months of training, could easily meet your needs. Unfortunately as a small startup, I can't really afford that. Facebook can. They choose not to. Further, I would like to point out the difference between doing Big Things and doing Great Things. I was the Chief Architect of Napster. I did Big Things. Were they Great Things? Probably not. Is the Facebook Like button or Facebook Pages a Great Thing? Almost certainly not.
- badclient 15y ago
  These posts are nothing short of slimy and the authors should be called out for their scumbag moment. I am tempted to call them outright scumbags but I'll give them the benefit of doubt for now. Personally, I have no problem if they believe that more of their talent should stick around and not do startups of their own. But if that is your position, just state it. Don't wrap it around a seemingly noble message like "do great" when in fact your real message is "fuck I hate these programmers who just wanna do their own thing and not work for me."
badclient 15y ago
<rant> About the author: At Facebook, he was technical lead in charge of Facebook's Pages, Facebook's "Like" button, and was responsible for Facebook Beacon I guess I am just not seeing "greatness" here. In the pickup artist world, there is a phrase called "keyboard jockey" used to describe people who love to type ideas and tips about meeting women but in reality, they are just recycling ideas they have read and spend very little time actually talking with women. Keyboard jockeys are not respected and called out on. I'd argue the tech world is increasingly getting filled with keyboard jockeys - folks who can write and preach seemingly-inspiring shit all day but don't actually eat their own dog food. /rant
- lpolovets 15y ago
  Those are pretty cool things to be a tech lead for. While I agree that those projects are not earth-shattering or incredibly innovative[1], Facebook's traffic numbers make everything technically interesting. For example, the Like button is served 3 billion times per day[2]. I'm sure FB has a lot of infrastructure for that kind of load, but knowing that you might have 3 billion daily hits leads to some interesting technical challenges. [1] Although perhaps somewhat earth-shattering just because hundreds of millions of people use those features. [2] http://venturebeat.com/2010/07/07/facebook-like-buttons/ http://venturebeat.com/2010/07/07/facebook-like-buttons/
  - badclient 15y ago
    Except neither "cool things" nor "technically interesting" have much to do with the author's core message: doing great things and changing the world for the better. It is especially humorous to see someone who worked on Facebook Beacon deride coupon startups and social games: I do not doubt that services like social games and coupons bring delight to people’s lives, and I mean no disrespect to the hard work that has made them possible. But in the face of threats to humanity’s future on the one hand and the extraordinary potential of mankind on the other, at some point we must ask: are we capable of more?
- zmitri 15y ago
  I think a lot of people who can't "create" greatness can still inspire it -- especially when you've got a high profile like him. Regardless of what's he's done, I'd rather he write something like that an inspire a couple people than do nothing. Who's to say that's not greatness in itself? I also agree with what he's saying in general, so maybe I'm a bit biased.
  - badclient 15y ago
    I also agree with what he's saying in general, so maybe I'm a bit biased. What he is saying is that he wishes his startup didn't have such a hard time retaining tech talent from going and doing their own start-up. It's amazing how we see the same evil bitching from these founders deceptively repackaged as something more noble.
badclient 15y ago
Translation: My start-up is having a really hard time retaining tech talent and keeping them from doing their own start-up. -- It's amazing how we see the same evil bitching from these founders deceptively repackaged as something more noble. First from Sean Parker, now this guy.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
lincolnq 15y ago
If you're interested in changing the world, it's worth considering the path of "make lots of money, then spend it on something good". Check out http://80000hours.org/ http://80000hours.org/ and Jaan Tallinn's talk about how to make an impact, http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2011/10/jaan-tallinn-speaks-at-singularity-summit-2011/ http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2011/10/jaan-...
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
colinsidoti 15y ago
Solving the talent dilution is as simple as paying the talent a ridiculous salary, and/or giving the talent work they enjoy. Getting by in the US is incredibly easy for a programmer, especially young ones that live off virtually nothing. I can freelance for a week and live a month without a problem. I don't really need more money. Unfortunately, my work options are usually narrowed down to these: 1. Freelance a little on things I'm not wildly interested in, but save enough money to spend the majority of time working on something I actually like. 2. Spend all my work time on things I'm not wildly interested in and have some more money, but nothing ridiculous. Maybe I'm weird but given the choice, I'm going with #1 every time. However, there are two circumstances where I might end up working for someone else: 1. Give me ridiculous compensation 2. Let me work on something I want to work on Paying a ridiculous salary is easy in a lot of cases, but nobody ever does that (and honestly, I don't know why). The better option, IMO, is just letting people work on what they want to work on. I don't understand why companies are so awful at describing the positions they have available. If you have positions that are appealing to work on, I'm sure you can find people to do it. If not, whip out the checkbook, or expect poor quality talent. Having interviewed with Asana for the Product Engineering role, I could say I still have no idea what I would have been building had I gotten the job. This made it impossible for me to be excited, I was running purely off the fact that "product" was in the title. Luckily, they had #1 (private chefs and a normal work day sold me), but I imagine they want people excited about the work too. Tell me what you're doing, let me understand how I can help, that will make me more excited.
AznHisoka 15y ago
For most people, our options in life are: 1) Being stuck in a dead-end, soul-crushing day job 2) Being able to have freedom to do your own gig. When those are your options, getting that freedom is your first priority. You don't worry about whether you're going to benefit the world in a positive way. You worry about that later. I would argue you can't even focus in any meaningful way on great things when the thought of being chained to a corporate job for 40+ years is on your mind.
haasted 15y ago
A wake-up-message that gets published every few years. Here's the last one: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10045321-36.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10045321-36.html Still relevant, though.
chauzer 15y ago
When I initially read that article, it really rubbed off on me the wrong way. But then I read all the comments on it and seeing friends and others comment/repost it on FB as well and they were all positive comments fully agreeing with the author. I thought maybe I just didn't get it or something. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one that feels the way I do about the article. It seems too much preaching and there's a sense of elitism in the post. It seems hypocritical that the author left Facebook (where by some standards he was doing great things and making a huge impact), to co-found his startup, Asana. Like others in the comments here, I agree that if this message came from someone else, doing something different (i.e. someone doing research in curing cancer) it would mean a lot more. Nothing wrong with Asana, and I think it's a good product, but it's not doing great things in the world and changing it amazingly for the better.

78 points by dabent 15y ago

Oh for goodness sakes. I'm sick of this woe-is-me, I-wasn't-around-for-the-90s, entrepreneurship is killing Silicon Valley bs. It is hard for Facebook to get an engineer. It is hard for Google to get an engineer. It is not particularly hard for a reasonably funded startup to get an engineer. I have a startup in San Francisco. When I post job opening, I get 50+ applications. When I email my network, I pick up even more. Because I'm picky, it probably takes 100 resumés before I find someone I'm looking for. However, there are plenty of people out there that, with six months of training, could easily meet your needs. Unfortunately as a small startup, I can't really afford that. Facebook can. They choose not to. Further, I would like to point out the difference between doing Big Things and doing Great Things. I was the Chief Architect of Napster. I did Big Things. Were they Great Things? Probably not. Is the Facebook Like button or Facebook Pages a Great Thing? Almost certainly not.

badclient 15y ago
These posts are nothing short of slimy and the authors should be called out for their scumbag moment. I am tempted to call them outright scumbags but I'll give them the benefit of doubt for now. Personally, I have no problem if they believe that more of their talent should stick around and not do startups of their own. But if that is your position, just state it. Don't wrap it around a seemingly noble message like "do great" when in fact your real message is "fuck I hate these programmers who just wanna do their own thing and not work for me."

badclient 15y ago

<rant> About the author: At Facebook, he was technical lead in charge of Facebook's Pages, Facebook's "Like" button, and was responsible for Facebook Beacon I guess I am just not seeing "greatness" here. In the pickup artist world, there is a phrase called "keyboard jockey" used to describe people who love to type ideas and tips about meeting women but in reality, they are just recycling ideas they have read and spend very little time actually talking with women. Keyboard jockeys are not respected and called out on. I'd argue the tech world is increasingly getting filled with keyboard jockeys - folks who can write and preach seemingly-inspiring shit all day but don't actually eat their own dog food. /rant

lpolovets 15y ago
Those are pretty cool things to be a tech lead for. While I agree that those projects are not earth-shattering or incredibly innovative[1], Facebook's traffic numbers make everything technically interesting. For example, the Like button is served 3 billion times per day[2]. I'm sure FB has a lot of infrastructure for that kind of load, but knowing that you might have 3 billion daily hits leads to some interesting technical challenges. [1] Although perhaps somewhat earth-shattering just because hundreds of millions of people use those features. [2] http://venturebeat.com/2010/07/07/facebook-like-buttons/ http://venturebeat.com/2010/07/07/facebook-like-buttons/
- badclient 15y ago
  Except neither "cool things" nor "technically interesting" have much to do with the author's core message: doing great things and changing the world for the better. It is especially humorous to see someone who worked on Facebook Beacon deride coupon startups and social games: I do not doubt that services like social games and coupons bring delight to people’s lives, and I mean no disrespect to the hard work that has made them possible. But in the face of threats to humanity’s future on the one hand and the extraordinary potential of mankind on the other, at some point we must ask: are we capable of more?
zmitri 15y ago
I think a lot of people who can't "create" greatness can still inspire it -- especially when you've got a high profile like him. Regardless of what's he's done, I'd rather he write something like that an inspire a couple people than do nothing. Who's to say that's not greatness in itself? I also agree with what he's saying in general, so maybe I'm a bit biased.
- badclient 15y ago
  I also agree with what he's saying in general, so maybe I'm a bit biased. What he is saying is that he wishes his startup didn't have such a hard time retaining tech talent from going and doing their own start-up. It's amazing how we see the same evil bitching from these founders deceptively repackaged as something more noble.

badclient 15y ago

Translation: My start-up is having a really hard time retaining tech talent and keeping them from doing their own start-up. -- It's amazing how we see the same evil bitching from these founders deceptively repackaged as something more noble. First from Sean Parker, now this guy.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

lincolnq 15y ago

If you're interested in changing the world, it's worth considering the path of "make lots of money, then spend it on something good". Check out http://80000hours.org/ http://80000hours.org/ and Jaan Tallinn's talk about how to make an impact, http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2011/10/jaan-tallinn-speaks-at-singularity-summit-2011/ http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2011/10/jaan-...

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

colinsidoti 15y ago

Solving the talent dilution is as simple as paying the talent a ridiculous salary, and/or giving the talent work they enjoy. Getting by in the US is incredibly easy for a programmer, especially young ones that live off virtually nothing. I can freelance for a week and live a month without a problem. I don't really need more money. Unfortunately, my work options are usually narrowed down to these: 1. Freelance a little on things I'm not wildly interested in, but save enough money to spend the majority of time working on something I actually like. 2. Spend all my work time on things I'm not wildly interested in and have some more money, but nothing ridiculous. Maybe I'm weird but given the choice, I'm going with #1 every time. However, there are two circumstances where I might end up working for someone else: 1. Give me ridiculous compensation 2. Let me work on something I want to work on Paying a ridiculous salary is easy in a lot of cases, but nobody ever does that (and honestly, I don't know why). The better option, IMO, is just letting people work on what they want to work on. I don't understand why companies are so awful at describing the positions they have available. If you have positions that are appealing to work on, I'm sure you can find people to do it. If not, whip out the checkbook, or expect poor quality talent. Having interviewed with Asana for the Product Engineering role, I could say I still have no idea what I would have been building had I gotten the job. This made it impossible for me to be excited, I was running purely off the fact that "product" was in the title. Luckily, they had #1 (private chefs and a normal work day sold me), but I imagine they want people excited about the work too. Tell me what you're doing, let me understand how I can help, that will make me more excited.

AznHisoka 15y ago

For most people, our options in life are: 1) Being stuck in a dead-end, soul-crushing day job 2) Being able to have freedom to do your own gig. When those are your options, getting that freedom is your first priority. You don't worry about whether you're going to benefit the world in a positive way. You worry about that later. I would argue you can't even focus in any meaningful way on great things when the thought of being chained to a corporate job for 40+ years is on your mind.

haasted 15y ago

A wake-up-message that gets published every few years. Here's the last one: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10045321-36.html http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10045321-36.html Still relevant, though.

chauzer 15y ago

When I initially read that article, it really rubbed off on me the wrong way. But then I read all the comments on it and seeing friends and others comment/repost it on FB as well and they were all positive comments fully agreeing with the author. I thought maybe I just didn't get it or something. I'm glad to see I'm not the only one that feels the way I do about the article. It seems too much preaching and there's a sense of elitism in the post. It seems hypocritical that the author left Facebook (where by some standards he was doing great things and making a huge impact), to co-found his startup, Asana. Like others in the comments here, I agree that if this message came from someone else, doing something different (i.e. someone doing research in curing cancer) it would mean a lot more. Nothing wrong with Asana, and I think it's a good product, but it's not doing great things in the world and changing it amazingly for the better.