3 ms·

> Damn, conspiracy theorist will have a field day now. Is there any evidence of foul play here? Why would this be more notable to conspiracy theorists than an

• andrewflnr 4y ago
  Conspiracy theorists don't need evidence. The mere suggestion that someone could benefit from killing environmental workers is plenty to keep them going.
  • mulmen 4y ago
    But why invite it? There’s a bunch or drivel posted in response but absent elsewhere in the comments. It’s not just feeding trolls, it’s leaving cookies and milk out for them.
    • andrewflnr 4y ago
      It's only "inviting" them to the extent that any mention of conspiracy theories is an invitation. Maybe a mistake, but not because of anything to do with evidence for/against any particular claim.
      • mulmen 4y ago
        Well, yeah, that’s my point. What is it about this case that makes invoking conspiracy theorists anything more than bait?