3 ms·
>Not supported (but perhaps in the future): >... >* PGP or S/MIME Would this mean integrated WKD (Web Key Directory) support for PGP?
by upofadown 4y ago
>Not supported (but perhaps in the future):
>...
>* PGP or S/MIME
Would this mean integrated WKD (Web Key Directory) support for PGP?
- mjl- 4y ago> Would this mean integrated WKD (Web Key Directory) support for PGP? Didn't know of that, thanks. I think this could be used to encrypt submitted messages before trying to deliver them? What I had in mind when I wrote that line, was server-side signing. But I don't think it's such a great idea to have private keys on a server. It would be convenient for use with email clients that don't support signing themselves. But I don't use PGP or S/MIME myself at the moment. So my messages get stored in plaintext, are typically transferred over TLS (might want to start enforcing that!). With SPF/DKIM/DMARC and with SMTP (submission) authentication, sender addresses aren't typically forgable anymore, so signing is perhaps less important than it once was.