2 ms·
If i'm reading this right, the author is blaming POSIX (and by implication unix) for the size of their code? Given POSIX is a system programming interface, aim
by cesaref 4y ago
If i'm reading this right, the author is blaming POSIX (and by implication unix) for the size of their code?
Given POSIX is a system programming interface, aimed at no specific use case whatsoever, maybe the issue is that they are using this directly rather than going via some sort of higher level abstraction, a library framework which would provide them with the capabilities that they need?