(1) @mrkurt: ... you can go ahead and find yourself another vendor. (2) @alexgraveley: [I'm] Trying! [to find another vendor] Kurt thinks Alex is choosing

(1) @mrkurt: ... you can go ahead and find yourself another vendor. (2) @alexgraveley: [I'm] Trying! [to find another vendor] Kurt thinks Alex is choosing to leave due to (2): @mrkurt: ok good luck [switching vendors by your own choice]. I'll refund all your payments. Alex thinks Kurt was the one telling him to go due to (1): @alexgraveley: I'm sorry, you're kicking me off your platform ... ? Typical human stuff. Maybe this is a great opportunity for an LLM extension - have it give people the benefit of the doubt before you respond nastily to them, by checking your response. I've tried asking ChatGPT a few times to explain responses people have made to me on Twitter that I didn't rate highly but which received likes. It wasn't particularly insightful, but its unbiased perspective had a surprisingly calming effect. EDIT: I fed all but the last line of this conversation into ChatGPT, then asked it to evaluate 'my' proposed reply (the final line) with the following prompt: "What is the presupposition behind my response? Can you point out any potential mistakes I've made in my assumptions?" It correctly identified the ambiguity in the statements, and made a helpful suggestion on how to proceed.