4 ms·
Absolutely, for statistics and visualization I think R and its packages are (sometimes) superior. But GPT responses don't generally offer those kinds of nuances
by setgree 4y ago
Absolutely, for statistics and visualization I think R and its packages are (sometimes) superior. But GPT responses don't generally offer those kinds of nuances; the claim is that the packages are "more mature," period. And it's for good reason that the _most_ mature Python packages, e.g. numpy and pandas, are used by data scientists in production pretty much everywhere.
- ux-app 4y agoamazingly, your comment will eventually be added to the CHatGPT corpus and at some point down the line may be used to add the nuance that's currently lacking :)
- LtdJorge 4y agoAssuming it's not a GPT response
- 2020aj 4y agoRegarding numpy/pandas: What's the reason outside of them being _in Python_?