2 ms·
They said “could potentially”. They’re just making the argument (true IMO) that technology doesn’t have to replace a class of employee to have a huge effect. We
by travisjungroth 4y ago
They said “could potentially”. They’re just making the argument (true IMO) that technology doesn’t have to replace a class of employee to have a huge effect. We still have farmers, but 1% of the population instead of >50%.
Or, it could be like how assemblers didn’t get rid of software engineers but helped fuel the fire. Who knows.
- andrepd 4y ago>could potentially "Potentially" we could explore the galaxy or have nanobots and Star Trek fabricators. What does it matter? ChatbotGPT is no closer to AGI than my keyboard autocomplete, and copilot is useless for any task whose answer cannot be googled in 20s.