> Quite literally the appellate court cited that they should have brought the claims earlier. From the appellate decision: "The superior court dismissed eight

> Quite literally the appellate court cited that they should have brought the claims earlier. From the appellate decision: "The superior court dismissed eight of the ten counts for failure to state a claim, for undue delay, as duplicative, as outside the scope of an election contest, or for some combination thereof." "her request for relief fails because the evidence presented to the superior court ultimately supports the court’s conclusion that voters were able to cast their ballots, that votes were counted correctly, and that no other basis justifies setting aside the election results." https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2023/1%20CA-CV%2022-0779%20and%201%20CA-SA%2022-0237.pdf https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Div1/2023/1%...