4 ms·
There's no substance here. Something can be wrong and legal, something can be litigious and cordial. This feels like a hit piece trying to get ahead of the case
by debacle 4y ago
There's no substance here. Something can be wrong and legal, something can be litigious and cordial. This feels like a hit piece trying to get ahead of the cases that will be shortly heard in AZ regarding the 2022 election.
There are a lot of people chasing ghosts with regards to election fraud, but it's pretty clear that signature verification for electronic voting isn't cutting it right now. That's not a political argument, it's a statistical one.
- briffle 4y agoAre we to agree with you that its clear because your a known expert in the field? Many people don't think its clear, that you can't have more verification without disenfranchising many, many voters. (My grandmother is 90, legally blind and hasn't had a drivers license in 10 years. How is she supposed to show ID to vote?) What is your alternative?
- junofan 4y agoLast 4 of social? There’s gotta be some middle ground. People need to compromise. Also, I think it’s fine for a citizen to have an opinion on how our democracy should work without being a “known expert in the field.”
- debacle 4y agoI didn't say anything about voter ID. Please take your strawman elsewhere.
- Arainach 4y agoThe content explicitly asked what your alternative is. That is the most commonly suggested alternative in public discourse; what's your solution if not that?
- mikeyouse 4y agoEvery one of the 2022 election cases heard so far has been thrown out because they're all as baseless as the 2020 batch. It's relentless bad faith by either dumb people or malicious ones, including Brnovich.