I'm not of that generation, but it's my impression they don't care whether the empty words come from a person, a politician, or a greeting card company; and the

I'm not of that generation, but it's my impression they don't care whether the empty words come from a person, a politician, or a greeting card company; and they certainly don't care if the empty words come from the brain of a university administrator or a website they visited. The words are all equally empty. The only thing that matters is a cultural change that will lead to fewer mass shootings. Getting angry at university administrators for whatever lack of empathy they demonstrate is myopic. There's plenty enough reason for people to get angry about the way things are, but this is the wrong thing to be mad about. > Why was the author even considering using AI in the first place? Maybe because there aren't anymore words to be said about these things. They happen so frequently, that the expectation is words will be said after the fact, rather than action will be taken to prevent the next occurrence. So here we are, days after the shooting, mad at the words someone said after the shooting, rather than the fact there was a shooting. Who here is still mad about the shooting? Who here is going to do something today to make the next shooting less likely?