3 ms·
Their 1st gen is a flop, already building a bad reputation, that'll be hard to recover, unless AMD's RDNA3 gen suspiciously flop too, there is already a lot of
by Kukumber 4y ago
Their 1st gen is a flop, already building a bad reputation, that'll be hard to recover, unless AMD's RDNA3 gen suspiciously flop too, there is already a lot of FUD about their high end versions despite crushing NVIDIAs so we'll see how it goes
RDNA2 does better at gaming than Intel's new GPUs, except for Raytracing, they have a head start to be future proof, but it ends there, they didn't plan out their strategy properly, specially when both their drivers and software sucks
Embedded, mobile, consoles, AI, Intel's GPU story there is inexistent
- brucethemoose2 4y agoI dunno, the A750/770 kinda look like the AMD 7950/7970 to me. Slow and power hungry and janky at first, but also aging conspicuously well. But it was late, which is a disaster in the gpu world.
- Kukumber 4y agoIntel's GPU are doing worse than RDNA2 wich is AMD's last gen https://www.techspot.com/review/2561-cod-modern-warfare-2-benchmark/ https://www.techspot.com/review/2561-cod-modern-warfare-2-be...
- brucethemoose2 4y agoYeah like I said, launch performance is bad, but also changing. The old 7970 also lost to the GTX 580 many launch day benches, even though it was a much bigger/newer GPU. But then it ended up significantly faster than the more expensive GTX 770.