2 ms·
I've upgraded Arch machines after a year offline and it sounds like that was less painful. Ubuntu has been making some interesting choices lately.
by doubled112 4y ago
I've upgraded Arch machines after a year offline and it sounds like that was less painful.
Ubuntu has been making some interesting choices lately.
- nix23 4y ago>Ubuntu has been making some interesting choices lately. Interesting like the Chinese Curse...true ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you_live_in_interesting_times https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you_live_in_interesting_ti...
- groestl 4y agoI found lxd very appealing in the beginning, but when they favoured snap as distribution channel, where, apparently, updates and restarts could only be blocked using the firewall [0], I moved away from it. And Ubuntu in general. [0] https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/disabling-automatic-refresh-for-snap-from-store/707/8 https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/disabling-automatic-refresh-for...
- doubled112 4y agoI liked LXD but had the same issues. I think OpenSUSE and Alpine have it in their repos as not-snaps now.
- groestl 4y agoHonestly, I could have packaged it myself, but it eroded my trust in the ecosystem. They seem to target a different use case. Which is fine by me, I just won't be in for the ride.
- zekrioca 4y agoNot true any longer. Debian has been officially [1] supporting LXD Debian packages [2] since September last year. And you can add this APT repo [3] — which follows the same Debian recipes - into your sources.list to install LXD natively with APT. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/LXD https://wiki.debian.org/LXD [2] https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/lxd https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/lxd [3] https://apt.calenhad.com/ https://apt.calenhad.com/