We’ll the distinction is permanent to statistics if we don’t know whom was interviewed. If you interviewed a child, and they said someone they played video gam

We’ll the distinction is permanent to statistics if we don’t know whom was interviewed. If you interviewed a child, and they said someone they played video games online with was a “friend” then that’s the box they go into even if you and I would say that guy is a dangerous stranger. I think that’s what the OP was trying to say. We should be wary about statistics that say nearly all predation is done by known friends and family. Thus we should rightfully be worried about the online interactions children have, and not simply brush it aside as paranoia.