4 ms·
Your argument doesn’t seem very coherent to me. Placing strict terms on how long temporary workers can be employed is not an issue in the case you point. If yo
by WastingMyTime89 4y ago
Your argument doesn’t seem very coherent to me.
Placing strict terms on how long temporary workers can be employed is not an issue in the case you point. If your demand really fluctuates, you will have ended their employment long before the generally generous limit.
Avoiding long term employment though a stint of short term contracts is legitimate. You don’t want company trying to wiggle out of employment law through this kind of stints and experience prove some definitely will.
- speleding 4y agoBusiness cycles in many industries can be 5-10 years, much longer than you are allowed to have people on temp contracts. Forcing companies to keep staff around they no longer need tends to make matters worse in the long run. I think the Danish model of combining a very flexible labour market with a great social safety net is better for all involved.