3 ms·
Do you believe waterfall was better and agile is a sort of race to the bottom? I do feel we have low quality requirements in the parts of the industry I've work
by YourDadVPN 4y ago
Do you believe waterfall was better and agile is a sort of race to the bottom? I do feel we have low quality requirements in the parts of the industry I've worked so far. It seems common to shove frameworks on Github with code that doesn't fully work, vast gaps in documentation, and combinations of build options that have never been tested. But I haven't been around long enough to know whether it's always been this way. Hardware at least usually seems to have good documentation.
- inphovore 4y agoConventions aren’t the concern. Mental preparation is. The agile process does not need as much cognitive overhead, features are iterating (and revising) in smaller unstructured increments. Cognitive overhead foresees problems, pre plans, and usually prefers working to spec. This approach also takes too long to discover over/under-sight. Slower, sure, yet everyone can relate to products that feel well thought through versus those which are wired together to provide certain features. With AI assist, those with more competent language and planning skills will produce more consistent results (though the less experienced may explore more). Which brings us to an actual intrigue: CURATION is king , whether it is features or art or content. Bringing a gratifying experience together (form or function) is the ultimate product.