3 ms·
> They want a one size fits all process that produces results, if not optimally, at least consistently I disagree with this statement. Waterfall produced good
by dustedcodes 4y ago
> They want a one size fits all process that produces results, if not optimally, at least consistently
I disagree with this statement. Waterfall produced good enough results. What they really want is the most meeting and process heavy approach irrespective of results, because those who advocate for Agile are the people who have no real job and this gives them enough bullshit to bs themselves through every day of their work week.
- wkat4242 4y agoWaterfall was good in a time where requirements were more static. It's not great when you don't know the requirements fully or they may change during the project. I'm not a fan of agile either though. I'm not a team player and agile is way too heavy on the framework side for me. Too many procedures and too much fuss around the work. Just give me a task and let me get on with it. But some parts of it are ok like close collaboration with the (internal) client. Luckily I work for a company that thinks logging our hours in Jira means we're agile so I don't really have a lot to do with it.