3 ms·
> arbitration almost always increases options for consumers A: could agree to arbitration or decide to go to trial. B: signed away right to trial so can only d
by mLuby 4y ago
> arbitration almost always increases options for consumers
A: could agree to arbitration or decide to go to trial.
B: signed away right to trial so can only do arbitration.
I fail to see how B provides more options for consumers than A.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> could agree to arbitration or decide to go to trial The point is to commit to a path ex ante. If I know someone has a $100k claim against me, and I have more liquidity than them, I’m not going to agree to arbitration.