3 ms·
Generally you see this in the lower class chips that aren’t overclocked to within an inch of instability. It’s not uncommon to see a chip that uses 200w to perf
by Panzer04 4y ago
Generally you see this in the lower class chips that aren’t overclocked to within an inch of instability. It’s not uncommon to see a chip that uses 200w to perform 10% worse at 100w, or 20% worse at 70w.
I can’t be bothered to chase down an actual comparison, but usually you’ll see something along those lines if you compare the benchmarks for the top tier chip with a slightly lower tier 65w equivalent.
- scns 4y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33231081 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33231081
- Panzer04 4y agoCheers for the link - if I read right there’s a cliff around 100w where power use goes way up for extremely marginal improvements. Below 100w it’s more linear, but that might depend on undercoating and the like as well.