3 ms·
Su is just talking up AMD’s strengths, many of which come care of TSMC and for which the original R&D was largely funded by Apple. She is not wrong, and AMD ha
by georgeburdell 4y ago
Su is just talking up AMD’s strengths, many of which come care of TSMC and for which the original R&D was largely funded by Apple. She is not wrong, and AMD has certainly made large gains in HPC recently, but AMD does not monopolize all possible paths to success here.
- greenknight 4y agoI agree that a lot of AMDs wins have come from TSMC. That being said, I feel like the biggest win for them over the past 5 years (well 6 now)... was moving to chiplets, which all started at Global Foundaries. Having the same chip, from the lowest end consumer chip all the way to the top end server chip means that they can spend less time and cost developing up processors for every segment, and they just bin the chips in terms of quality. Intel is starting to make changes towards this structure but they haven't fully committed to it yet.
- bitL 4y agoA move to chiplets would be just prolonging their terminal suffering if they didn't replicate Haswell in the first Ryzen chips, making them somewhat performance-competitive and due to chiplets also economically viable with the ability to wow consumers with the first 8 core desktop chips and later 12/16/24/32-core ones.
- spixy 4y ago5nm? It was also funded by AMD since it is their customer, and by many other customers.
- georgeburdell 4y agoAMD just released a 5nm product a few months ago. Apple’s M1 is a year older. Apple funded 5nm