3 ms·
As icegreentea noted elsewhere in the comments, The Economist recently compared Kodak to Fujifilm, which has done rather better at transitioning from film. htt
by yohui 15y ago
As icegreentea noted elsewhere in the comments, The Economist recently compared Kodak to Fujifilm, which has done rather better at transitioning from film.
http://www.economist.com/node/21542796 http://www.economist.com/node/21542796
http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2012/01/how-fujifilm-survived http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2012/01/how-fujifi...
- flomo 15y agoIt should be noted that Fuji was more on the $5 film roll side and less on the $30 processing, so they had less to lose. Kodak supplied chemicals and paper to the entire industry.