4 ms·
>Note that you just says "yes, we do need hundreds more dead in the hopes of putting tens of thousands of people out of a job". Not sure I'm down with that. We
by midoridensha 4y ago
>Note that you just says "yes, we do need hundreds more dead in the hopes of putting tens of thousands of people out of a job". Not sure I'm down with that.
Well then you disagree with Boeing and the aviation regulators then.
>Just because the law didn't do enough according to you, doesn't mean you should be okay with (let alone advocate for) people dying just to teach a company a lesson.
Many more will die because the regulators aren't regulating and no one has been held responsible.
>Because government is (for good reasons) not allows to meddle with how a private company is structured internally.
So mass murder is Ok as long as it's done by a corporate executive?
- TheRealPomax 4y agoKid, you're advocating for mass murder. Check your intentions and reign them in.
- midoridensha 4y agoYou're the one who thinks corporate executives who design systems that murder hundreds should be left alone. Take your libertarian shit and peddle it elsewhere.
- TheRealPomax 4y agoWow. If the reality of living in a country with a constitution, constitutional amendments, as well as a litany of tort and criminal law (and subsequent case law for both) that all dictate what the government can and cannot do feels libertarian to you, I have some unfortunate news for you.