But I was under the impression that ChatGPT would help people be more kind and compassionate in their correspondence if they struggled with that before? Wouldn

But I was under the impression that ChatGPT would help people be more kind and compassionate in their correspondence if they struggled with that before? Wouldn’t someone start by creating some basic points about what they want to express and then edit the response? Isn’t ChatGPT supposed to be a “jumping off point” for these kinds of thing? Are people mad because the author was transparent about their use of editing tool? Should the Dean have been less transparent? I don’t put in my correspondence that I use spelling and grammar checks in Word, so why would you say you used ChatGPT?