5 ms·
I nearly considered moving to Edge on my last Windows install. In the end, it's true that IE/Edge were bad choices before moving to WebKit. Now, why not? A mor
by clement_b 4y ago
I nearly considered moving to Edge on my last Windows install.
In the end, it's true that IE/Edge were bad choices before moving to WebKit. Now, why not? A more integrated browser (as Safari is for Mac) makes sense x Google being evil(er) x Firefox being left behind (for bad reasons, but still) x Bing being a good Bing x Google Search being less useful.
I agree the method isn't good, but feels like Edge is not a bad choice anymore.
- junon 4y agoFirefox certainly hasn't been left behind. I'm not a Firefox fanatic and don't use it all the time but it's far from a bad/abandoned browser.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- vanviegen 4y ago"Edge is not a bad choice anymore"!? That's your response to discovering Edge is injecting ads in competitors' websites? Any browser that crosses this line is irredeemably corrupt in my book. I will not have it.
- attentive 4y agoIt's bad for privacy. Worse than chrome IMHO. For me it's either firefox or brave.
- soundnote 4y agoDo you like a browser that doesn't end to end encrypt your browsing history when syncing it? Because that's what Edge does, and there's no option to turn e2ee on as far as I know. As far as I know, Chrome doesn't default to it, but it can be turned on. Brave, Vivaldi and Firefox all operate independent sync services that are zero knowledge.