4 ms·
I don't think that was the point. I think the point was that as long as you're happy with 90% accuracy, you can have that for 10% of effort. It requires a pers
by thih9 4y ago
I don't think that was the point. I think the point was that as long as you're happy with 90% accuracy, you can have that for 10% of effort.
It requires a perspective shift. Then again, cost efficiency is a big motivator.
- hinkley 4y ago90% accuracy is lousy. Especially for anything that isn't a one-off interaction, such as with customers or developers. That's a 35% chance at a failure after 4 interactions.
- thih9 4y agoWouldn’t this depend on a lot of external factors? 90% failure rate can be lousy in one use case and can be perfectly adequate in another.