I'd argue that it's a solution to the problem that programmers are expensive and only a fraction can be counted on to produce 100% reliable code anyway. While

I'd argue that it's a solution to the problem that programmers are expensive and only a fraction can be counted on to produce 100% reliable code anyway. While it's possible for a highly-skilled, highly-professional developer can both write code that will solve a given problem 100% correctly and write tests that will prove that it solves them for the entire domain, in practice most developers fall short on both counts. Every time you interact with a date or phone number field that chastises you for your use or non-use of punctuation, you know this. So, for many use cases, it's possible imperfect programmers will be replaced with neural networks that are 95% accurate, perhaps with a differently-trained one checking the work of the first one.