3 ms·
If assume the article is correct and there will be Software 2.0, what's the cost of running it vs cost of running Software 1.0? The reason I'm asking is given t
by kklisura 4y ago
If assume the article is correct and there will be Software 2.0, what's the cost of running it vs cost of running Software 1.0? The reason I'm asking is given this quote "when the network fails in some hard or rare cases, we do not fix those predictions by writing code, but by including more labeled examples of those cases." - is it more costly to do "curating, growing, massaging and cleaning labeled datasets" and ultimately training neural networks than to just write code? Maybe not for small NNs, but for DNNs?
- gtirloni 4y agoIdeally, providing labeled examples can be done by relatively cheaper humans.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zelphirkalt 4y agoThe higher level the labeled examples become, the more effort is needed to make them in the first place. For example take a website. How are we going to provide enough examples of websites to make the code generated fit what we need and not have annoying properties we want to void? Lets say we have a website and we tell the code generator of choice, that we want that website to be accessible for blind people. How do we create the amount of labeled examples, that make the code generator understand what to create? Maybe that very creation of labeled examples will be a software developer's future work activity.