I don't really understand the setup. It seems to suggest that physicalism claims all things can be learned intellectually, in a box. It seems obvious to me tha

I don't really understand the setup. It seems to suggest that physicalism claims all things can be learned intellectually, in a box. It seems obvious to me that sensory experiences could be physical in nature yet also can only be learned experientially. Is there really a debate that learning about color and seeing color are not the same things? I don't know if the setup is unfair or the physicalism being referred to is silly. Either way this seems pointless to me.