3 ms·
From the Copyright Alliance, a copyright notice isn't needed to retain full copyright protection, including on new works, since 1989: https://copyrightalliance
by rexreed 4y ago
From the Copyright Alliance, a copyright notice isn't needed to retain full copyright protection, including on new works, since 1989:
https://copyrightalliance.org/education/copyright-law-explained/copyright-basics/what-is-copyright-notice/ https://copyrightalliance.org/education/copyright-law-explai...
"A copyright notice does not need to be affixed to a copyrighted work for the work to be protected under the law.
Prior to 1989 including a copyright notice on a copyrighted work was required under U.S. law, but that is no longer the case. Although copyright notice is no longer required, a copyright owner would be wise to include a copyright notice because it prevents an infringer from raising a defense of innocent infringement."
Furthermore, a copyright year may not be needed if a copyright notice with (c) mark is included.
So the copyright notice is primarily useful as a notice to others with regards to your work, but has no real use as a legal construct to establish ownership.
- bazoom42 4y agoIt is like writing your name inside your jacket. It might help you in case of disputes or if it gets lost, but it doesn’t in itself change the ownership of the jacket.
- schemescape 4y agoThe wording in that article makes it sound like it’s only discussing US copyright law. Does it address international concerns?
- jjk166 4y agoThis was actually the point when the US joined the Berne convention and started treating copyright the same way as the rest of the world.
- schemescape 4y agoThanks! That wasn't clear from the link (or maybe I missed it). I was curious so I looked up the list of countries that aren't signatories to the Berne Convention, and it does include some populous countries (Iran, Ethiopia), as well as Taiwan. (Not saying this is important--just seemed interesting.)