3 ms·
Wouldn't it be simpler for them to just have moles in the police department? Or bribe some of the officials involved?
by adharmad 4y ago
Wouldn't it be simpler for them to just have moles in the police department? Or bribe some of the officials involved?
- gpvos 4y agoThese things don't exclude each other. Also, people can be more expensive and less reliable than machinery.
- shanebellone 4y agoMoles can testify. Cameras cannot.
- dsfyu404ed 4y agoTechnology doesn't have family members you can cripple.
- moremetadata 4y agoExactly, where there's a will, there's a way. What is your interpretation of a will?
- geodel 4y agoAutomation thru better tech infrastructure is key. Moles keep asking for more benefits, like insurance, improved health coverage, increasing travel expense and so on. Money is not raining on anyone including gangs where any service price can be paid, no question asked.
- mschuster91 4y agoThat always carries the risk of leaving a trail somewhere or getting set up by a sting operation. Tech, assuming it's reasonably well secured (and tamper proof is ever easier and easier to achieve), doesn't.