> You are cherry-picking examples from my list to prove a point. I am pointing out that the generalizations you made don't even hold in the small examples that

> You are cherry-picking examples from my list to prove a point. I am pointing out that the generalizations you made don't even hold in the small examples that you came up with. > I resolutely assert that Sanskrit-derived first and last names are markers of upper-caste ancestry. and > there are people of lower-caste with Sanskrit-derived names These both can't be true. > Dravidian/tribal names I don't understand this bizzare conflation of Dravidian with tribal. What does tribal even mean in this context?