> Maybe it will improve in the future. To be fair, I find this entertaining. Very entertaining. The early 80s, another wave of exciting AI happened (from Jap

> Maybe it will improve in the future. To be fair, I find this entertaining. Very entertaining. The early 80s, another wave of exciting AI happened (from Japanese and US government funding) but there was a question which shocked Douglas Lenat so badly he dedicated himself since then to build a system of basic facts, that being Cyc. The question is: if Susan goes shopping does her head go with her? ( sorry if I do not quote it word-by-word by correct, it's been over a quarter century when I had my exam on this topic :) ) You can generate any amount of such questions which a two year old human would have no trouble answering but no AI -- so far -- could possibly answer unless of course that question and answer already occurred in some text. ChatGPT was called a stochastic parrot and it's not that ChatGPT is that, the entire model can not possibly produce anything else. Reasoning doesn't enter into this picture. So, not only it will not improve in the future, it can not improve.