4 ms·
It's probably neither a good or a bad thing, it's just a "we found something that may guide our future understanding of how mRNA vaccines work". Sounds like bas
by hannob 4y ago
It's probably neither a good or a bad thing, it's just a "we found something that may guide our future understanding of how mRNA vaccines work". Sounds like basic research that has no direct implications.
- ekianjo 4y agoThe surprise is why this was never tested before by Pfizer or Moderna themselves. For all drugs you typically evaluate how they are metabolized in the body, and this has never been published before. Very sloppy standards.
- shagie 4y agoYou are likely looking for the research done on flu vaccinations. From 2017 https://www.flagshippioneering.com/press/moderna-announces-positive-interim-phase-1-clinical-data-demonstrating-first-mrna-vaccine-candidate-mrna-1440-induces-high-levels-immunogenicity https://www.flagshippioneering.com/press/moderna-announces-p... And also from 2017 Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1653 in Healthy Adults https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03392389 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03392389 The research and testing for mRNA had been a decade in the making and was already present in 2019.
- ekianjo 4y agoYou need to do that for every new drug marketed, you can't just refer to prior art.