3 ms·
I was under the impression that Anonymous was just kind of a brand that anyone who wanted to could assign credit to for their activities (since they have the pu
by siegecraft 15y ago
I was under the impression that Anonymous was just kind of a brand that anyone who wanted to could assign credit to for their activities (since they have the publicity infrastructure in place)
- arctangent 15y agoYou're correct. But I believe there's a certain amount of coordination going on behind the scenes in order to arrange significant activities. Anonymous is an interesting cultural phenomenon, but hiding behind a common shared identity is not new. For example, see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple-use_name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple-use_name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Collective_pseudonyms http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Collective_pseudonyms