3 ms·
riaa.org, mpaa.org, and universalmusic.com I could see being unpatched, but I would have thought justice.gov would have to be patched for compliance reasons.
by redthrowaway 15y ago
riaa.org, mpaa.org, and universalmusic.com I could see being unpatched, but I would have thought justice.gov would have to be patched for compliance reasons.
- gee_totes 15y agoThat's a logical point. But compliance with what? All I can find after a quick google search is National Institue of Technology GUIDELINES, and the only laws mentioned seem to deal with user privacy. In fact, the only compliance regulations I know of with government sites have to do with accessibility. [EDIT] Wait, I might be wrong. The DoD guide seems to cite quite a few regs, some of which may apply to the Justice department. Too bad I can't check their site :P http://www.defense.gov/webmasters/policy/dod_web_policy_12071998_with_amendments_and_corrections.aspx http://www.defense.gov/webmasters/policy/dod_web_policy_1207...
- officemonkey 15y agoSee also: FISMA. http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SMA/fisma/index.html http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SMA/fisma/index.html
- awj 15y ago> but I would have thought justice.gov would have to be patched for compliance reasons. I don't think that's true. I'd imagine the server behind justice.gov has no connectivity to anything important for compliance reasons, so patching it isn't really a big deal. Relevant xkcd: http://xkcd.com/932/ http://xkcd.com/932/